Compare Naga vs

Naga

Dragorossi
Overall
84%
Naga


Manoeuvrability
83%
Linear Speed
100%
Turning
100%
Stability
67%
Boof
100%
Lightness
83%
Outfitting
83%
Material resistance
67%
Good for beginner
100%
Good for intermediate
100%
Good for advanced
80%
Good for steep
100%
Good for volume
83%

Weight Of Use
75-85 kg
Good
This canoe is very easy to maneuver and turn, especially at low speeds. Even without significant boofing, the tip rocker tends to overwhelm everything. Its linear speed is on par with all current fast canoes. It's definitely a good choice for waterfalls. The very wide cockpit at knee height makes getting in and out of the canoe very comfortable.
Bad
The only negative I've experienced, accustomed to the Phoenix, is the lack of tail grip during turns; if you want to change direction at speed, the tail tends to drift, making the maneuver slow. Boofing is also limited due to the considerable length and surface area of ​​the tail, but it certainly can't be said that the canoe doesn't boof well. The cockpit and the volume around the knees are decidedly large, and the spray skirt is quite exposed to impact with the paddle shaft (which could shorten the life of the spray skirt).

Gnarvana

Jackson
Overall
86%
Gnarvana


Manoeuvrability
100%
Linear Speed
50%
Turning
100%
Stability
100%
Boof
100%
Lightness
83%
Outfitting
67%
Material resistance
100%
Good for beginner
100%
Good for intermediate
100%
Good for advanced
100%
Good for steep
100%
Good for volume
67%

Weight Of Use
Version M 75 -90 kg
Good
Easy boat for hard and easy rivers. Very good lateral stability in every situation. Easy to boof and control at medium-low speed.
Bad
The speed is the biggest problem of this boat. It is slow and if it get speed, it's hard to keep it straight. In big volumes the huge volume in the nose could be hard to control.